Subscribe to Datalight's Blog


EZ NAND compared to eMMC

A recent article by Doug Wong compared performance characteristics of eMMC and ONFI specification EZ-NAND, specifically Toshiba’s SmartNAND here:

One consideration I would add to this quite excellent summary is about the availability of drivers. Raw NAND has been around for quite a while and the market supplies a large range of drivers. Many of these will utilize the basic functionality of SmartNAND and other EZ NAND chips with only small modifications. Drivers for eMMC, on the other hand, are much harder to find. Only Linux has a freely available driver, which Google’s Android has taken advantage of in recent releases.

At Datalight, we continue to be excited by both of these new technologies. From the JEDEC eMMC parts, the cool features such as Secure Delete and Replay Protected Memory Block are very exciting. On the other hand, the sheer performance of Toshiba’s SmartNAND and other EZ NAND solutions is very much in demand.

Thom Denholm | November 8, 2011 | Flash Industry Info, Flash Memory, Performance, Uncategorized


  1. Jose George says:

    Interested in pros/cons of each type of NAND

  2. Peter says:

    Thanks for your excellent introduction and summary.
    Lookiong to me, “wear leveling, bad block management, ECC, and logical-to-physical address translation” are the key factors.
    In fact, all of these can be implemented in pure NAND flash controller as well. After all, eMMC solution is most likely like the gasket/brdige converting between SDHC interface and NAND flash interface, not better than pure NAND controller solution. I understand, eMMC standard is very mature and widly used,just want to think from technical point of view. And with ONFI spec development (3.0, up to 400MB/s), can eMMC solution be still suitable ? And I feel it’s tend to put above work (ECC,etc) into nand-flash to off-load controller and achive better performance.
    Please share your point, thanks!

    Best regards,

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>